When deciding if jamming can be a solution for an airport, airport security and aviation law should ask many questions. In order to summarize what we have discussed in this blog series, I have answered what I consider to be five key questions:
Q1. What is the best jamming technique?
To be effective, noise jamming must be used. There are three techniques available: sweep, spot, and barrage. Spot jamming is not effective against drones that are frequency agile because it focuses on one frequency. Sweeping jamming also only focuses the energy on a single frequency, so it can't follow the pattern of frequency-agile drones. Barrage jamming has lower power on each frequency and a smaller range. However, it jams drones using all four frequencies.
Q2. That's great! Is it possible to jam all four frequencies?
While the jammer is in use, it will have an adverse effect on airport and aircraft operations. This could also have major collateral effects for businesses and homes near the airport. It is possible to jam all four frequencies, but this will likely result in the grounding of all aircraft and flight diverts. Airports and airlines will be affected by a suspension of operations, not to mention any negative publicity.
Q3. What type of airport jammer would be best for an airport, given the risks?
Each type of jammer, whether omnidirectional or directional, will have different impacts on airport operations and aircraft. It may also affect local businesses, communities, and even local businesses. The most disruptive jammer is the omnidirectional one, which doesn't require cueing on the drone. It jams everything in a full 360 degrees and can cause the airport to be disrupted.
The drone must be cued to activate directional jammers, which only jam in one direction. Both are expensive due to the sheer power, number of jammers required, and additional sensors needed to trigger the jammers. Airports are the best place to install targeting jammers as they cause minimal disruption and they're easy to use.
Q4. Okay, so if you want to target jammers, what is the best way to do it?
This solution seems to be the least complex. The jammer operator needs to have a clear and direct line of sight, but this is not possible on an airfield with its slab-sided terminals, hangers, and control towers. The public and passengers will be alarmed to see what appears to be a gun pointed in the air by the operator as he attempts to shoot a drone that is moving fast.
The range of targeting jammers is limited on an airfield, and they do not protect the airways leading into and out of the airport. This makes them vulnerable. Yes, using jammers to target aircraft is an option. However, it will result in all flights being diverted and the grounding of the entire fleet until the chase ends.
Q5. What are the risks associated with drones' response to jammers?
It doesn't matter which type or technique of jammer you use, nor what drone model is being targeted. If the jamming works effectively, the impact is the same on the drone: the GPS signal and/or pilot signals are drowned. The use of jammers to target drones can be very effective, but it does not allow the drone to take over or its pilot.
The drone will try to respond as programmed when jammed. However, this outcome is unpredictable, and out of control of the operator. They can only observe and report the drone's responses. The drone may return to its take-off location safely, fly halfway home and crash or land in an unidentified location, try to fly home the most direct way across runways or fly into infrastructure. It may be programmed to crash or land in the middle or a runway, but it could also fly into an aircraft apron, terminal or ATC tower.
The drone can hover as long as its battery lasts, then crash or land, or it could fly off and return in another direction. It may be programmed to fly in an unpredictably unpredictable direction, across the runways until it crashes, or land in an unknown place, if GPS jamming works. If the drone is working correctly, the drone will eventually leave the jammer's range, and the control will return to the drone pilot. This will allow the pilot to continue harassing the airport or attacking it.
Alternative Solutions for Airports
1. Physical Barriers:
- Walls, fences, and shielding materials can block or weaken unwanted signals.
2. Signal Encryption:
-
Encrypting communication signals can prevent unauthorized access and interference. This is particularly effective for sensitive communications, such as air traffic control.
3. Other Security Measures:
-
To boost airport security, we can use:
-
Surveillance cameras
-
Access control systems
-
Staff training
-
These methods work well without needing jamming technology.
All in all, targeting jammers might work in some cases, but they aren't ideal for airports. They can disrupt real communications. They are also complex and costly. They raise regulatory issues and have tech limitations. Airports should look at other options. They can use physical barriers, signal encryption, and various security measures. These steps can boost security and improve operations.
What risks come with using targeting jammers? How do drones react to them?
Targeting jammers could be an option, but it’s not recommended for airports. The risks of how drones react to them can be serious. Here are some key risks:
1. Loss of Control
-
Drone Malfunction: When a drone faces targeting jammers, it can lose control signals from the operator. This can lead to the drone becoming uncontrollable, posing a risk of collision with obstacles or people.
-
Autonomous Behavior: In some cases, drones may be programmed to execute predefined emergency maneuvers when they lose connection with the operator. However, these maneuvers may not always be appropriate or safe in the given context.
2. Navigation Errors
-
GPS Disruption: Targeting jammers can interfere with the GPS signals that drones rely on for navigation. This can cause the drone to lose its position awareness, leading to inaccurate flight paths and potential collisions.
-
Alternative Navigation Failures: If the drone relies on alternative navigation systems (e.g., inertial navigation, vision-based navigation), these systems may also be affected by the jamming, further complicating the drone's ability to navigate safely.
3. Data Loss and Communication Interruption
-
Data Corruption: Jamming signals can cause corruption or loss of data being transmitted by the drone, such as sensor data or video feeds. This can impair the operator's situational awareness and ability to make informed decisions.
-
Communication Failure: The jamming can also disrupt communication between the drone and the operator, preventing the operator from sending commands or receiving critical information from the drone.
4. Safety Hazards
-
Collision Risk: Due to the loss of control and navigation errors, the drone may collide with obstacles, other aircraft, or people, causing property damage or personal injury.
-
Unpredictable Behavior: The drone's response to jamming can be unpredictable, leading to hazardous situations that are difficult to anticipate or mitigate.
5. Legal and Regulatory Concerns
-
Violation of Regulations: Using targeting jammers may violate local laws and regulations governing the use of radio frequencies and electromagnetic interference. This can lead to legal consequences for the operator.
-
Interference with Critical Infrastructure: In some cases, targeting jammers may interfere with critical infrastructure such as air traffic control systems, further exacerbating the safety risks.
While targeting jammers may have some potential uses in specific scenarios, the risks associated with how drones respond to them are significant and multifaceted. These risks include loss of control, navigation errors, data loss and communication interruption, safety hazards, and legal and regulatory concerns. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully consider these risks before deploying targeting jammers in any context, especially in sensitive environments such as airports.